Supreme Court of India

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui

Neutral citation
Bench Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta JJ.
Decided 12 February 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

For the above reasons, we dispose of the appeals by holding that the engagement of the respondent is as a daily wage employee.

Judgment, page 10

From the headnote

Labour Laws: Regularisation – Claim of – Respondents engaged as registration clerks on daily wages – Respondent’s case that his appointment was on a regular basis and not as a daily wager – Proceedings before the High Court and this Court – On remand to the High Court to consider whether the appointment made were in consistent with r. 22, the High Court holding that the appointment was not in breach of r. 22, set aside the termination and issued directions for grant of consequential benefits – On appeal, held: Record clearly indicate that the engagement of the respondent at all material times…

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.