Supreme Court of India
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Suresh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Sentencing – Principle of Proportionality – Case of the prosecution that the accused-respondent assaulted his father who later succumbed to the injury – Trial Court found the respondent guilty u/s.304 Part II, IPC and awarded him 3 years’ rigorous imprisonment while setting off the period of detention already undergone (3 months, 21 days) against the term of imprisonment imposed on him – High Court though upheld the conviction of the respondent but modified the sentence of 3 years’ rigorous imprisonment to that of the period already undergone i.e.
Authorities it was built on
- 2012 Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
- 1995 Ravji @ Ram Chandra v. State of Rajasthan
- 2005 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Saleem@ Chamaru and Anr.
- 2000 State of Karnataka v. Krishnappa
- 2000 Dalbir Singh v. State of Haryana
- 2003 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ghanshyam Singh
- 1953 Kalawati and Another v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- 1995 Union of India v. Sh. Ganshyam Dass Kedia and Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.