Supreme Court of India
The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987: s.20- (2) – Prior sanction under s.20A(2) – Validity of – By impugned order, Designated Court held that there was no prior sanction under s.20- (2) before taking cognizance of the offence committed by the respondents – Held: Perusal of the subject sanction order showed that it adverted only to the FIR and proposal received from DSP – The noting in the sanction order was indicative of the fact that it was not a sanction to prosecute the accused but at best giving permission to apply the provisions of TADA – Such a sanction cannot be…
Authorities it was built on
- 2005 State (n.c.t. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@afsan Guru
- 1991 State of Bihar Etc. Etc. v. P.P. Sharma, Ias and Anr.
- 2012 Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- 2005 Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Bhutto v. State of Gujarat
- 1997 Rambhai Nath Bhai Gandhvi and Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- 1998 Mohd. Iqbal M. Shaikh and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- 2007 Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2017 Seeni Nainar Mohammed v. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police
- 1996 Ahmad Umar Saeed Sheikh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.