Supreme Court of India

Pattu Rajan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Neutral citation
Bench N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Indira Banerjee JJ.
Decided 29 March 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the High Court was justified in observing that a superimposition test cannot be taken as a conclusive one for the identification of a dead body, because by itself it may not conclusively establish identification.

Judgment, page 31

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860: s.302 – Abduction and murder of husband of complainant (PW1) – Prosecution case was that accused no.1 wanted to take PW1 as his third wife knowing that she was already married to victim-deceased and made several attempts with the help of other accused to severe the relationship between PW1 and her husband – Prior to the day of incident, the deceased and PW1 were abducted by accused no.1 and his henchmen but on the same day were released for which a separate complaint was lodged by PW1 and separate trial was conducted – Subsequent to this event of abduction, accused committed murder of the PW1's husband so as to marry PW1 without any obstruction.

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.