Supreme Court of India
Benckiser (india) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Resultantly, even though no relief can be granted to the applicant as against respondent No.2, we proceed to pass the following order in the interest of justice.
Judgment, page 20
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – ss. 11(5), 11(9) and 11(12)(a) – Signatory and non-signatory parties to the arbitration agreement – According to the applicant, the respondents had approached them with an offer to print labels – Pursuant thereto, respondent no.1 and applicant entered into an agreement dated 01.05.2014 – It was averted that arbitration agreement was an integral part of the agreement dated 01.05.2014 – Respondent no.2 was a non-signatory party to the agreement dated 01.05.2014 – Dispute arose between the parties – Respondent no.2 was impleaded in the arbitration…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Cox and Kings Ltd. v. Sap India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- 2022 Cox and Kings Limited v. Sap India Private Limited & Another
- 2022 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.