Supreme Court of India
Britannia Industries Ltd. v. Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 – s. 2(1)(a) – “Agricultural Produce” – Products “edible oil”, “Vanaspati” and “sugar” – Applicability of the Act – Held: Products “edible oil”, “Vanaspati” and “sugar” are agricultural produce within the meaning of s.2(1)(a) of the Act. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court rightly held that sugar is a produce of agriculture coming into being in a processed form from sugarcane and the absence of the word “manufacture” in the definition of “agricultural produce” under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra…
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.