Supreme Court of India
Madhusudan Bhanuprasad Pandya v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the above reasons, we see no merit in the Special Leave Petition.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976: s.20 – Application for exemption under s.20 filed by appellant – State Government rejected the application – Writ petition filed by appellant to set aside the order of State Government rejecting exemption – High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that entire procedure of vesting the land in Government and taking the possession thereof under s.10 of the Act was completed way back in the year 1990 and rejected the plea of appellant that upon repeal of the said Act, the proceedings would abate – On appeal, held: s.3(1)(b) of the Repealing Act…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.