Supreme Court of India
National Highways Authorityof v. Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
National Highways Act, 1956: s.3G(5) – Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 – s. 11 – Appointment of arbitrator – Application u/s. 3G(5) of the 1956 Act for appointment of an Arbitrator by the Central Government – Allegation that Central Government did not respond to the request for appointment – Thereafter, application filed u/s. 11 of the 1996 Act – Maintainability of application u/s. 11 of the 1996 Act, in view of s. 3G(5) of the 1956 Act – Held: When the special law sets out a self-contained code, the application of general law would impliedly be excluded – Scheme of 1956 Act, being a…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Chief General Manager (ipc) Mp Power Trading Co Ltd & Anr. v. Narmada Equipments Pvt Ltd
- 2022 National Highways Authority of India v. Sri P. Nagaraju @ Cheluvaiah & Anr
Of those, 1 followed · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.