Supreme Court of India
Chhota Ahirwar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss.307/34 – Attempt to murder with common intent – Applicability of s.34 – Prosecution case was that PW-3-complainant, the accused appellant and the main accused were related to each other – There was previous enmity between them over land dispute – On the fateful day, when PW-3 was on his way, he was stopped by accused appellant and told not to cultivate his land – Quarrel started between PW-3 and accused appellant – The main accused also came and intervened, whereupon PW-3 told him, not to interfere and to go home, as he was in no way concerned with the dispute…
Authorities it was built on
- 1981 Barendra Prasad Ray & Ors. v. The Income-tax Officer 'a' Ward Foreign Section and Ors.
- 2002 Lallan Raj and Ors. v. State of Bihar
- 2005 Harbans Kaur and Anr. v. State of Haryana
- 1959 Bharwad Mepa Dana & Another v. State of Bombay
- 2007 Manik Das and Ors. v. State of Assam
- 2010 Abdul Mannan v. State of Assam
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Gulab v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2024 Shoyeb Raja v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2022 Jasdeep Singh @ Jassu v. State of Punjab
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.