Supreme Court of India
Parvat Singh & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the appellants herein – original accused nos. 2 to 5 are entitled to be given the benefit of doubt.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302 r/w s. 149 – Murder – All the accused including the appellants came to be tried by the Trial Court for the offences u/s. 302 r/w. s. 149 of the IPC for having killed son of the informant-PW-8 – The Trial Court convicted appellants- original accused nos. 2 to 5 for the offences punishable u/s. 302 r/ w. s. 149 of the IPC – The High court confirmed the conviction of the appellants – Before the Supreme Court, the appellants contended that the High Court has not properly appreciated the fact that so far as the evidence/ deposition of PW-8 is concerned, it is full of…
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.