Supreme Court of India
B.B.M. Enterprises v. The State of West Bengal and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that adequate reasons were given to dispose of the Section 34 petition filed by the respondent.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 34 – Petition under – Filed after expiry of limitation period of 120 days – Dismissed by District Judge – High Court setting aside the order of District Judge remanded the matter – In second round of litigation District Judge dismissed the petition – High Court by impugned order again remanded the matter to be adjudicated afresh – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: District Judge had disposed of the petition u/s. 34 giving adequate reasons – High Court wrongly remanded the matter – Appeal disposed of.
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.