Supreme Court of India
Ganesan v. State Represented by its Inspector of Police
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – ss. 7 and 8 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2012 – r.7(2) – Appellant- accused was tried for the offences punishable u/s. 7 r/w. s. 8 of the POCSO Act – Relying upon the deposition of PW-3 victim, aged 13 years the accused was convicted for the offence u/s. 7 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment u/s. 8 of the Act – The accused was also ordered to pay rupees one lakh to the victim girl, by way of compensation u/r. 7(2) of the Rules, 2012 – Before the High Court, it was noted that…
Authorities it was built on
- 1990 State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewal Chand Jain
- 2010 Vijay @ Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2019 Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2011 Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana
- 2014 Vinod Kumar v. Gangadhar
- 2012 Rai Sandeep @ Deepu v. State of Nct of Delhi
- 2002 State of Orissa v. Thakara Besra and Anr.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.