Supreme Court of India
Chandra Mohan Varma v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant who attained the age of 60 years – the age of retirement which prevailed at the relevant time – was not entitled to the benefit of the notification dated 6 February 2015.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh State Medical Colleges Teachers, Service Rules 1990 – r.26 – UP Fundamental Rules notified u/s.241 (2) (b) of the Government of India Act, 1935 – Benefit of the increase in the age of retirement from 60 to 65 years as a consequence of the notification dated 6 February 2015 – Entitlement to, sought by the appellant who retired on 13 August 2014 but was continuing in service in view of the ‘session benefit’ granted by the .O dated 19 November 2012 – Held: The Notification enhancing the age of retirement is a special order within the meaning of Rule 26 – Notification dated 6…
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.