Supreme Court of India
M/s. Ss Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Aaditiya J. Garg & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid, in our opinion, the limitation for filing the written statement in the present proceedings before the National Commission would be deemed to have been extended as it is clear from the order dated 23.03.2020 that the extended period of limitation was applicable to all petitions/ applications/suits/appeals and all other proceedings.
Judgment, page 4
From the headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986: s.38 – Deficiency in service – Respondents booked flats with the appellant-builder – Flats were not delivered on time – Consumer complaint filed before National Commission claiming refund of money – Notices issued in June 2020 and received by the appellant on 13 July 2020 – Written statement/ reply filed by appellant on 31 August 2020 which was beyond the period of 45 days – National Commission declined to take the written statement on record on the ground that Consumer Court has no power to extend the time for filing the response to the complaint beyond 45 days…
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.