Supreme Court of India

Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Neutral citation
Bench S.A. Bobde, A. S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian JJ.
Decided 26 March 2021

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the considered view that the claim for proportionate representation on the Board is neither statutorily or contractually sustainable nor factually justified. 19.49 Placing reliance upon section 163 of the Companies Act, 2013, it was contended that proportionate representation is statutorily recognised.

Judgment, page 149

From the headnote

Companies Act, 2013 – ss. 241 and 242 – Held: The sine qua non for invoking s.241 is that the affairs of the Company should have been conducted or are being conducted in a manner oppressive or prejudicial to some of the members – In a petition u/ s.241, the Tribunal cannot ask the question whether the removal of a Director was legally valid and/or justified or not – The question to be asked is whether such a removal tantamount to a conduct oppressive or prejudicial to some members – Even in cases where the Tribunal finds that the removal of a Director was not in accordance with law or was not…

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.