Supreme Court of India
Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that condition No.2 has also to be fulfilled before ingredients of Section 364A are found to be established.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s.364A – Essential ingredients – For covering an offence under s.364A, apart from fulfillment of first condition i.e. “whoever kidnaps or abducts any person or keeps a person in detention after such kidnapping or abduction”, the second condition, i.e., “and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person” also needs to be proved in situation the case is not covered by subsequent clauses joined by “or”.…
Authorities it was built on
- 2015 Vikram Singh@ Vicky &anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2004 Malleshi v. State of Karnataka
- 2006 Anil@raju Namdev Patil v. Administration of Daman & Diu, Daman and Anr.
- 2007 Suman Sood @ Kamal Jeet Kaur v. State of Rajasthan
- 1999 Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- 2007 Vishwanath Gupta v. State of Uttaranchal
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.