Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Veerpal & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeal is allowed.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Evidence Act, 1872 – s.32 – Dying declaration – Appreciation of – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate in which deceased specifically stated that due to feud over demand of money, respondents-accused burnt her after pouring kerosene over her – On facts, no reason to doubt the dying declaration recorded by the magistrate – Statements in the dying declaration consistent with medical evidence inasmuch as there were no injuries on the chest and injuries were found only on the head and backside – Such injuries on the head and backside could have been possible only if somebody have poured…
Authorities it was built on
- 1992 Smt. Paniben v. State of Gujarat
- 1975 Munnu Raja & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 1985 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Sagar Yadav and Ors
- 2008 Amol Singh v. State of M.P.
- 1993 Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 1999 Koli Chunilal Savji and Anr. v. State of Gujarat
- 2019 Jagbir Singh v. State
- 2008 Vikas & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.