Supreme Court of India
Intercontinental Hotels Group (india) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the finding in SMS Tea Estates [SMS Tea Estates (P) Ltd. v.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – ss. 11(6), 11(12)(a) & 16 – Appointment of Arbitrator – Karnataka Stamp Act – Stamp Duty on Arbitration Agreement – Respondent, an Indian Company engaged in hospitality sector, entered into a Hotel Management Agreement (HMA) with Petitioners – HMA mandated that for the renovation undertaken by the petitioners, respondent was contractually bound to pay the fee to the petitioner as incentive fees – As per the petitioner, respondent failed to pay the requisite fee – Respondent via mail on 12.10.2018 terminated the HMA stating that the Hotel was rebranded…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and the Indian Stamp Act 1899 v..
- 2023 Gujarat Composite Limited v. A Infrastructure Limited & Ors.
- 2023 M/s N. N. Global Mercantile Private Limited v. M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.