Supreme Court of India
Neeraj Dutta v. State (govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 : ss. 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) – Proof of demand of illegal gratification – Prosecution case that a trap was laid and the appellant-Electricity Inspector came with the co-accused and demanded the documents and bribe of which was paid by the complainant – Special Court holding that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence on record to prove the guilt of the appellant, convicted her for the offence punishable u/ ss. 7 and 13(i)(d)(i) and (ii) rw 13(2) – High Court upheld the same – On appeal, held : Apart from the evidence of PW-5-shadow witness, there is no…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Raju @ Umakant v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2025 Dashrath v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2024 The State of Karnataka v. Chandrasha
- 2024 M/s Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2024 Mir Mustafa Ali Hasmi v. The State of A.P.
- 2024 Sita Soren v. Union of India
Of those, 6 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.