Supreme Court of India
Soundarajan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Vigilance Anticorruption Dindigul
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 : ss. 7, 13(1)(d), r/w 13(2) – Illegal gratification – Appellant-Sub-Registrar demanded gratification of Rs.500/- from the complainant-PW 2, for handing over the registered sale deed – Complaint filed – Trap laid and in presence of shadow witness PW-3, the appellant caught red-handed while accepting the bribe – However, complainant did not support the prosecution and was declared hostile – Trial court convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences punishable u/s 7 and s. 13(2) r/w s. 13(1)(d) – Upheld by the High Court – On appeal, held : To attract…
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah & Ors.
- 2024 M/s Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2026 The State by Lokayuktha Police v. K. Rangayya
- 2026 Sandeep Yadav v. Satish
Of those, 2 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.