Supreme Court of India
Ms. Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India, through Secretary General
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Advocates Act, 1961: s. 16 – Designation of Senior Advocates – Criteria for – Guidelines laid down in *Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India’s case, to bring in greater transparency and objectivity in the designation process of Senior Advocates – 2017 Judgment given effect by the Supreme Court Guidelines to Regulate Conferment of Designation of Senior Advocates, 2018 – Plea that the guidelines enumerated not exhaustive and require reconsideration by suitable additions/deletions – Held: Guidelines for designation of Senior Advocates modified as regards, voting by secret ballot, cut-off…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Orissa High Court and Others v. Banshidhar Baug and Others Etc.
- 2025 Jitender @ Kalla v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
- 2025 Supreme Court Bar Association & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2025 Jitender @ Kalla v. State (govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Of those, 1 distinguished · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.