Supreme Court of India
The Esi Corporation v. M/s. Radhika Theatre
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 – s.1(6) (inserted w.e.f. 20.10.89) – Whether w.r.t the demand notices post 20.10.89, a factory or an establishment established prior to 20.10.89 shall be governed by the ESI Act notwithstanding the number of persons employed therein – Held: Prior to insertion of sub-section (6) of s.1, only those establishments/factories engaging more than 20 employees were governed by the ESI Act – However, after sub-section (6) of s.1 was inserted on 20.10.89, under the amended provision a factory or establishment to which ESI Act applies would be governed by the ESI Act…
Authorities it was built on
- 2000 Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (muster Roll) and Anr.
- 2009 Bombay Anand Bhavan Restaurant v. The Deputy Director, Esi Corporation and Anr.
- 1963 The Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Venkatiah and Anr.
- 2014 The Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. v. Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.