Supreme Court of India
Prem Prakash v. Union of India through the Directorate of Enforcement
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
Held as under:- 976 [2024] 8 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports “In my judgment this is clearly a confession, as I have already said, and, as has been pointed out by Jackson J. In Kodangi V. Emperor (AIR 1932 Mad 24.) a confession made to the Police in the course of investigating crime A, although it relates to another crime B, is equally inadmissible.
Judgment, page 21
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023) for a new case in which his arrest is not yet shown, and which are claimed to contain incriminating material against the maker, would be admissible under Section 50, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Authorities it was built on
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2005 Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- 1978 Nandini Satpathy v. Dani (p.l.) and Anr.
- 1952 Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2013 Nimmagadda Prasad v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2024 Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.