Supreme Court of India
Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court committed any error in bringing the case within the ambit of “attempt to commit murder” punishable u/s.307 IPC on the ground that the deceased-R died after a period of nine months from the date of the incident. Headnotes† Penal Code, 1860 – First limb of s.300 – Fatal injury – Intention to cause death – Death occurs after several days of complications – Principle that Courts must remember: Held: If it is proved that the injury was fatal and the intention was to cause death, though the death occurred after several days of septicaemia or other…
Authorities it was built on
- 2024 IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA AND RELATED ISSUES v. versus
- 2001 Patel Hiralal Joitaram v. State of Gujarat
- 1974 Sudershan Kumar v. The State of Delhi
- 2023 Prasad Pradhan & Anr. v. The State of Chhattisgarh
- 1996 State of Haryana v. Pala and Ors.
- 1995 N.G. Sreedharan and Anr. v. State of Kerala
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.