Supreme Court of India
Bharat Mittal v. State of Rajasthan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that a director of a company cannot be granted a blanket exemption from the deposit contemplated under Section 148 of the Act, as suggested in Bijay Agarwal.
Judgment, page 44
Authorities it was built on
- 2010 National Small Industries Corp. Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal and Anr.
- 2014 Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2007 C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and Anr
- 1999 Anil Hada v. Indian Acrylic Limited
- 2008 M/s. Harman Electronics (p) Ltd. & Anr. v. M/s. National Panasonic India Ltd.
- 2011 Kaushalya Devi Massand v. Roopkishore Khore
- 2017 N. Harihara Krishnan v. J. Thomas
- 2024 Shri Gurudatta Sugars Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Prithviraj Sayajirao Deshmukh & Ors.
- 2024 Muskan Enterprises & Anr. v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2024 Bijay Agarwal v. M/s Medilines
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the Supreme Court's own signed PDF — the original file as the Registry published it, not a copy somebody has watermarked or re-branded
An email address, no password.