Supreme Court of India
Home Care Retail Marts Pvt. Ltd. through its Authorised Representative v. Haresh N. Sanghavi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
Held as under: SLP(C) Nos. 29972/2015, 11139/2020 & 26876/2014 Page 24 of 25 “.
Judgment, page 23
In brief
The appellants had lost in arbitral proceedings and, while their challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were pending, sought interim measures under Section 9 to protect the subject matter/amount in dispute. The courts below declined relief on the ground of maintainability, holding that post-award relief under Section 9 is confined to protecting the 'fruits of the award' and is therefore unavailable to a party with no enforceable award in its favour; the Bombay High Court dismissed the resulting Section 37 appeals following its own decision in Dirk India.…
Authorities it was built on
- 2025 Gayatri Balasamy v. M/s Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited
- 2004 Firm Ashok Traders and Anr. Etc. v. Gurumukh Das Saluja and Ors. Etc.
- 2003 M/s. D.L.F. Qutab Enclave Complex Educational Charitable Trust v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- 2022 Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the Supreme Court's own signed PDF — the original file as the Registry published it, not a copy somebody has watermarked or re-branded
An email address, no password.