Supreme Court of India
Yerram Vijay Kumar v. The State of Telangana & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that there is no reason or ground to quash the offences under the IPC of which cognizance has been taken by the Special Court.
Judgment, page 27
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether cognizance of the alleged offences u/ss.448 and 451, Companies Act, 2013 could have been taken on a private complaint in view of the statutory scheme of the Companies Act and if not, whether the criminal proceedings must be quashed in respect of those sections; if the proceedings for the offences u/ss.448 and 451, Companies Act ought to be quashed, would the criminal proceedings also have to be quashed in respect of the offences under the IPC in light of the provisions as contained in s.436(2), Companies Act; whether continuation of the criminal proceedings…
Authorities it was built on
- 2007 Tax Recovery Officer, Central Range-1 v. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (trial of Offences Relating to Transaction in Securities) Act, 1992
- 2020 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Calicut v. M/s. Cera Boards and Doors, Kannur Kerala & Ors.
- 2015 S. Satyanarayana v. Energo Masch Power Engineering & Consulting Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.