Supreme Court of India
Bharat Raj Meena v. Central Bureau of Investigation
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that there are certainly elements of doubt in the manner the trap was executed, which the Trial Court ignored.
Judgment, page 46
In brief
The appellant, as Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Palakkad, was alleged by the CBI to have demanded and collected illegal gratification from RPF personnel seeking transfers and postings, using two subordinates, Constable Anantha Narayanan (PW-2) and Head Constable Abdul Gafoor (PW-7), as intermediaries; both were arraigned as accused, later pardoned under Section 306 CrPC and examined as approvers. In the trap of 04.08.2005 arising from complainant Nandakumar's (PW-6) allegation, the appellant declined the money when it was offered directly in his chamber and asked that it be given to PW-2, from whom the tainted Rs.…
Authorities it was built on
- Neeraj Dutta v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)
- B. Jayaraj v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 2014 Union of India through Cbi v. Nirala Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadav @ Deepak Yadav
- 1957 Sarwan Singh v. The State of Punjab
- 2026 The State by Lokayuktha Police v. K. Rangayya
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the Supreme Court's own signed PDF — the original file as the Registry published it, not a copy somebody has watermarked or re-branded
An email address, no password.