Supreme Court of India

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors.

Neutral citation
Bench R. F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat and V. Ramasubramanian JJ.
Decided 14 July 2020

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

19 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above, the decision of the Madras High Court in K. Ramajyam (supra), which states that evidence aliunde can be given through a person who was in-charge of a computer device in the place of the requisite certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act is also an incorrect statement of the law and is, accordingly, overruled.

Judgment, page 64

From the headnote

Evidence Act, 1872 – ss.3, 22A, 45A, 61-65, 65A, 65B, 136 – Interpretation of s.65B – Electronic records – Admissibility of – Appellant’s election challenged on the ground that his nomination papers having been filed after the stipulated time ought to have been rejected – Respondents relied on video camera recordings of the office of Returning Officer (RO) – Video recordings produced by Election Commission without requisite certificate u/s.65- (4) – However, admitted in evidence by High Court, relying upon oral evidence of RO in cross examination – Election of the appellant declared void…

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.